Subject: Re: multijurisdictional cities<br/>
Date: Jun 27, 2003 @ 20:12<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="10701.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next&emsp;[<a href="topic10701.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="10717.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="10719.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-443507740">hahahaha<br/>
i only just got your title<br/>
good one<br/>
hahaah<br/>
<br/>
a nomenclatural fiasco of peneclavic proportions <br/>
& another nice lame example try too<br/>
very droll<br/>
<br/>
yet brcko & the big apple will gladly answer to <br/>
y o u r <br/>
term <br/>
either way it could be understood<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
& yikes maybe even jerusalem & nicosia too<br/>
but how odd to see the really divided cities offer themselves now<br/>
as they are already the practical antithesis of the starting idea<br/>
even if they do also meet your terms<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
--- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, Brendan Whyte <br/>
&lt;bwhyte@u...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; A joint municipality for Albury (NSW) and Wodonga (Vic) either <br/>
 </span></blockquote>side of the <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; Murray River in SE Australia has been proposed over the years, <br/>
 </span></blockquote>most <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; recently only a couple of years ago, but while Canberra thinks <br/>
 </span></blockquote>it&#39;s good, <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; the locals don&#39;t.<br/>
&gt; As the Murray is a narrow river in a wide multichanneled <br/>
 </span></blockquote>watercourse, the <br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt; two towns are a couple of km apart.<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; BW </span></blockquote></div>