Subject: Border Towns Eye Canadian Plan to Lessen Penalty for Pot Use
Date: Jun 13, 2003 @ 10:57
Author: Bill Hanrahan ("Bill Hanrahan" <hanrahan@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


Jun 13, 2003
Border Towns Eye Canadian Plan to Lessen Penalty for Pot Use
By Krista Larson
Associated Press Writer
 
SWANTON, Vt. (AP) - Some of Nicole Cook's classmates in this town less than 10 miles from the Canadian border already head north on weekends because it's legal for 18-year-olds to drink in Quebec.
 
And as the Canadian government debates whether to decriminalize the possession of small amounts of marijuana, Cook worries such a move would encourage more teens to head north.
 
"I think it's a massive danger because I've heard of so many people and I know of so many people that have gone to Canada and done that and come back and gotten in car accidents and stuff," said Cook, 17, a student at Missisquoi Valley Union High School.
 
While marijuana possession would remain illegal under the proposed Canadian legislation, those found with 15 grams (about a half ounce) or less would receive a citation akin to a traffic ticket. Maximum fines for that amount would range from roughly $182 for those under 18 to approximately $292 for adults.
 
The possession of similar amounts of marijuana in Vermont is a misdemeanor punishable on a first offense by up to six months in jail, a $500 fine or both.
 
"We're trying to discourage drug use and trying to make people more aware that it's not OK, and then Canada is just kind of like, it's a slap on the hand and you move on," said Cook, who is involved in drug prevention efforts at her school.
 
Marijuana use in Vermont is higher than the national average, according to Marcia LaPlante of the state Health Department.
 
"I think regardless of what happens in Canada, we know marijuana is an issue here," she said.
 
Crossing into Canada is common for those in the northern part of the state, sometimes with tragic consequences. In 1998, four Vermont teenagers were killed in a car accident after partying in Quebec.
 
But some view the proposed legislation and the differences between Canadian and American laws as an opportunity for educating teens about the dangers of driving while impaired by drugs.
 
"Just because you're not going to get a criminal record, doesn't mean that you can drive any better for getting home," said Susan Lloyd, a counselor at Missisquoi. "So that's a danger with marijuana just like it is with drinking."
 
Under the Canadian legislation, driving while impaired by drugs remains a criminal offense; a working group there is currently looking at the issue of detecting drivers suspected of drug use. Options under consideration include asking suspects to perform physical tests or to give urine samples.
 
Ultimately, helping teens make the best decisions regarding drug use will involve focusing on issues that are important regardless of whether Canada changes its law, said Beth Crane, co-coordinator of Franklin County Caring Communities, a St. Albans-based drug prevention coalition.
 
"It's really key not only to focus on the consequences of using, but the value of not using and seeking other ways to challenge boredom, to challenge stress, to challenge all of those things that teens struggle with in a rural community," she said.