847. Jungholz connection is a point
     ... Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 16:39:57 +0100 From: Andrew U. Frank To: David Mark Subject: RE:
     Nov 06, 2000 @ 15:54 - David Mark (David Mark <dmark@...>)
878. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Jungholz connection is a point
     here we go indeed this makes it conclusive at 3 unquestionable votes for a point as opposed to 1 or 2 unquestionable votes against a point i think but i forget
     Nov 12, 2000 @ 01:01 - michael donner (michael donner <m@...>)
883. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Jungholz connection is a point
     This one is really bother Peter alot, and he is chasing the truth with zeal. So the last word is not said in this matter yet. For the new people, here is a
     Nov 12, 2000 @ 15:05 - Jesper & Nicolette Nielsen ("Jesper & Nicolette Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
895. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Jungholz connection is a point
     There is a file in the Public Record Office in London on Jungholz and Kleinweisertal (sp?) nearby, when they were in the British sector of austria post-war.
     Nov 13, 2000 @ 15:08 - Brendan Whyte ("Brendan Whyte" <brwhyte@...>)