- Mexican internal maritime allocation
... Although I consider myself a Mexiphile and researcher on most things Mexican, I ve never know the republic s internal maritime allocation regime. Mike,
Sep 24, 2003 @ 02:43 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
- Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
as i recall mexico is basically just like canada in reserving its entire maritime territory to the federal government except that canadian federal waters end &
Sep 24, 2003 @ 03:00 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
... From: m06079 To: Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:00 PM Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re:
Sep 24, 2003 @ 03:12 - John Seeliger ("John Seeliger" <jseelige@...>)
- Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
... right this is the ironic boca chica or little mouth of the rio grand where i once walked across almost without getting wet lately it has been mostly bone
Sep 24, 2003 @ 03:30 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
That is bizarre! Are you sure that the Mexican states don t even include the beaches, or is it just a matter of federal government ownership of the beaches
Sep 24, 2003 @ 03:31 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
- Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
yes i finally am sure now thanx to you http://www.mexicolaw.com/LawInfo30.htm
Sep 24, 2003 @ 13:33 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
So, are you saying that this URL makes you sure that the Zona Federal Maritimo Terrestre (ZoFeMaT) is beyond the jurisdiction of the states? It says to me
Sep 24, 2003 @ 14:33 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
- Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
the writer of this spanish text deplores that it is actual federal jurisdiction rather than merely federal ownership
Sep 24, 2003 @ 16:48 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
Thanks for the useful URL. The writer of the editorial makes the point that there is no constitutional basis for the ZoFeMaT--it being based only on a federal
Sep 24, 2003 @ 18:35 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
At www.funcionpublica.gob.mx/unaopspf/dgapi/lgbn_c4.htm is the text of Article 49 of Mexico s General Law of National Goods, in which is delimited the ZoFeMaT.
Sep 24, 2003 @ 20:00 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
- Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
... ticle
49 of Mexico s General Law of National Goods, in which is delimited the Z= oFeMaT.
Section I says:
When the coast presents beaches, the
Sep 24, 2003 @ 20:37 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
- Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
... you bet & which means it is the law of the land in mexico under the mexican constitution a law doesnt have to be in the constitution to be legal He does
Sep 24, 2003 @ 20:43 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
I ve been digging in the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States, and I think I ve arrived at the bottom of the question! More just as soon as I
Sep 24, 2003 @ 21:02 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
- Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
... Ar=
ticle
49 of Mexico s General Law of National Goods, in which is delimited the= Z=
oFeMaT.
Section I says:
When the coast
Sep 24, 2003 @ 21:10 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
Below, I quote in English translation from the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States (as amended through June 26, 2003), which clarifies several
Sep 24, 2003 @ 23:41 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
... Of course. I think his point was that, since it s only a statute and not in the constitution, the change for which he agitates can and should be
Sep 25, 2003 @ 00:26 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
- Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
... shed.
yes but that means it would need to be changed from its present status
which is of legal federal territory & jurisdiction
& which he finds so
Sep 25, 2003 @ 02:18 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
- Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
... shed.
yes but that means it would need to be changed from its present status
which is of legal federal territory & jurisdiction
& which he finds so
Sep 25, 2003 @ 02:19 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
I feel that I am somewhat badly misunderstood, but we ll just have to agree to disagree. Lowell G. McManus Leesville, Louisiana, USA ... From: m06079
Sep 25, 2003 @ 02:31 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
- Re: Mexican internal maritime allocation
apologies for the inadvertent double post
& i thought you made yourself misunderstood very well
in any case we do appear to already agree to within 20 or 100
Sep 25, 2003 @ 02:40 - m06079 ("m06079" <barbaria_longa@...>)