Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Gideon<br/>
Date: Oct 18, 2000 @ 22:16<br/>
Author: michael donner (michael donner &lt;m@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="797.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="801.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic797.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="797.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="799.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-359901535">gladly tho<br/>
for san marino & monaco & andorra he doesnt mention boundary markings at all<br/>
  but does show a pic of a road sign entering monte carlo<br/>
<br/>
liechtenstein switzerland he says is undemarcated undisputed unchanged<br/>
since 1434<br/>
but for austria liechtenstein he again simply doesnt mention markings<br/>
<br/>
for lesotho he mentions only one potential marker<br/>
yet perhaps it is not a marker but just a place with a funny name<br/>
the pillar of jammerburg<br/>
where the boundary intersects the caledon river<br/>
<br/>
he also says<br/>
demarcation of the drakensberg watershed technically raises a problem as<br/>
the almost vertical escarpments of the range<br/>
which face outward from lesotho<br/>
do not always constitute the drainage divide<br/>
<br/>
he goes on<br/>
occasionally the escarpments & the drainage divide diverge<br/>
leaving grazing land between the boundary & the slopes of drakensberg<br/>
etc<br/>
<br/>
but i might add that gideon seems rather casual about mentioning markings<br/>
generally<br/>
as compared to the regional bible i once saw<br/>
<br/>
m<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt;<br/>
&gt;Hello Mike<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;Can you post details of the boundary marking of<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;San Marino, Monaco, Liechtenstein, Andorra and Lesotho?<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;Jesper </span></blockquote></div>