Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] another miscellany but best i can for now<br/>
Date: Jul 15, 2001 @ 22:03<br/>
Author: David Mark (David Mark &lt;dmark@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="3244.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="3252.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic3244.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="3244.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="3246.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-541916461">On Sun, 15 Jul 2001, Michael Donner wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; nice going  jc<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; david  look in this new nmoktx picture again<br/>
&gt; & i am 99 percent sure you will see the sign you are seeking<br/>
&gt; between jc & the navy van<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>But if the cement post with the benchmark did not move between 1997 and<br/>
2001, then the &quot;witness post&quot; metal sign moved about 2-3 meters north and<br/>
rotated by 90 degrees counter-clockwise.  A manouevre for which the sign<br/>
probably needed some human help. <br/>
<br/>
** Michael, where in relation to this post was your non-authentic monument<br/>
that Jane was photographed with earlier with her tongue out?<br/>
<br/>
David</div>