Subject: Re: Roetgen/Monschau enclaves<br/>
Date: Jun 07, 2001 @ 13:17<br/>
Author: Peter Smaardijk (&quot;Peter Smaardijk&quot; &lt;smaardijk@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="2734.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="2759.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic2696.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="2739.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="2741.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-663640506">Yes, but to draw the main border WEST of the railway at Entenpfuhl <br/>
(i.e. near the smallest enclave), so that part of the Vennbahn ends <br/>
up in Germany, is just manifestly wrong! To put both B258 to the nw <br/>
(up to Gruenklosterberg) and L114 to the east (for more than half the <br/>
distance) in Belgium is also wrong. One should expect even from a <br/>
100k topo map a better representation of the facts than this.<br/>
<br/>
Peter S.<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> --- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;Brendan Whyte&quot; &lt;brwhyte@h...&gt; wrote:<br/>
&gt; Your right, my 1989 edition of sheet 113 at 1:100 000 does label <br/>
all the <br/>
&gt; German roads as N, not B. the smallest enclave won&#39;t show at this <br/>
scale.<br/>
&gt; On the 1:50 000 sheet &quot;Eupen 35-43&quot;, the enclaves all show and the <br/>
boundary <br/>
&gt; is correct.<br/>
&gt; I think the 100k maps are a touch too small scale for the detail <br/>
required at <br/>
&gt; the border.<br/>
&gt; BW </span></blockquote></div>