Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] men mee mes & mew<br/>
Date: Aug 03, 2000 @ 14:21<br/>
Author: michael donner (michael donner &lt;m@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="271.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next&emsp;[<a href="topic271.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="271.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="273.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-483755249">hey randy<br/>
<br/>
great one too<br/>
<br/>
i am cribbing from a 1997 ibru bulletin by david h gray<br/>
which seems to indicate canada did then have 5 maritime disputes<br/>
1 of them involving maine<br/>
& 1 denmark<br/>
yess<br/>
  & the other 3 involving alaska at both ends & washington state<br/>
<br/>
the dispute involving maine concerns machias seal island<br/>
whose position disqualifies it for both mee & mes<br/>
<br/>
on the resolution of this dispute hinges the allocation of vast territorial<br/>
waters<br/>
but more importantly to us<br/>
a possibly new geoposition for the cameus or crmeus tripoint<br/>
<br/>
so yes you are absolutely on point here<br/>
tho i dont know if it will affect the attempt<br/>
<br/>
nice shooting<br/>
<br/>
m<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
ps<br/>
most delicious in this bulletin also is the revelation that there were<br/>
  & so probably still are<br/>
2 small areas of nobodys water adjacent to southernmost alaska<br/>
& a dispute there affecting the positions of several major multipoints</div>