Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Fiat boundaries<br/>
Date: May 03, 2001 @ 17:17<br/>
Author: michael donner (michael donner &lt;m@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="2297.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="2299.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic2251.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="2297.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="2299.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-711650443">nice thinking tho<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
now would you apply your powers to bwnazmzw too<br/>
where we do stand a snowballs chance in chad<br/>
<br/>
m<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt;<br/>
&gt;It just occured to me: if the countries could decide that each of it<br/>
&gt;has to be bordering on the lake as long as it&#39;s there, then a real<br/>
&gt;quadripoint will emerge at the spot where the last water molecule<br/>
&gt;will evaporate!<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;Not a very likely scenario...<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;Peter S.<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;Peter Smaardijk&quot; &lt;smaardijk@y...&gt; wrote:<br/>
&gt;&gt; I wonder, since those boundaries were never defined, whether the<br/>
&gt;&gt; states that were adjacent to the lake when it was still a lake and<br/>
&gt;&gt; not a puddle, now want their boundaries prolonged </span></blockquote></div>