Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] revised canada & caus guesses<br/>
Date: Apr 13, 2001 @ 23:39<br/>
Author: Brian J. Butler (&quot;Brian J. Butler&quot; &lt;bjbutler@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="2059.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="2061.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic2059.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="2059.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="2061.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1249479613">This sounds good, and reasonable.<br/>
<br/>
BJB<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> ----- Original Message -----<br/>
From: michael donner &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:m@...">m@...</a>&gt;<br/>
To: &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>&gt;<br/>
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 6:54 PM<br/>
Subject: [BoundaryPoint] revised canada & caus guesses<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
&gt; <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://realtor.mls.ca/london/MNR/fact_sheet_ls2.htm">http://realtor.mls.ca/london/MNR/fact_sheet_ls2.htm</a><br/>
&gt;   in the section entitled  what are crown lands<br/>
&gt; surprised me by implying that  crown  may mean not only the federal<br/>
&gt; government but also a provincial government as well<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; aha<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; if this is true<br/>
&gt; then all the canadian crown inland waters may well have been fully<br/>
&gt; distributed to the provinces & territories<br/>
&gt; & thus may not produce federative tripoints at all<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; aha<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; so maybe no need to get drunk without a life jacket in ontario after all<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; & if that is the case<br/>
&gt; then all the dreaded myriads of hypothetical freshwater federative<br/>
tripoints<br/>
&gt;   both the internal ones & those on the caus line<br/>
&gt; simply dry up on the spot<br/>
&gt; leaving only the maritime crown waters tripoints still probably intact<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; anyway i certainly hope this is all true<br/>
&gt; because then the analysis could be completed fairly easily<br/>
&gt; & in esthetically pleasing & even & round numbers to boot<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; granted that there would still be at least several possible views<br/>
&gt; & with all due respect to them<br/>
&gt; but following the nicholson information previously culled<br/>
&gt; i would summarize the major domestic multipoints as follows<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;  0 multiprovincial points<br/>
&gt;  4 mixed status multipoints  all on the 60th parallel<br/>
&gt; 10 mixed status coastal federal waters multipoints  well scattered<br/>
&gt; 26 multiterritorial coastal federal waters points  all arctic<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; 40 total  legally real  primary subdivisional multipoints<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; & i would summarize the tripoints on the caus international boundary as<br/>
follows<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; 18 mixed provincial or territorial & state tripoints  on inland boundaries<br/>
&gt;  8 crown waters & provincial or territorial & state tripoints  on coasts<br/>
&gt;  4 crown & american & state waters tripoints  at 3 mile limits  disputed<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; 30 total  legally real  mixed interfederative tripoints<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; ahh<br/>
&gt; that feels good<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; m<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/</a><br/>
&gt; </span></blockquote></div>