Subject: legends in our own minds<br/>
Date: Apr 12, 2001 @ 17:44<br/>
Author: michael donner (michael donner &lt;m@...&gt;)<br/>
Prev&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next<br/>
<a href="2043.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="2045.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-266308272">those who access the group via <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BoundaryPoint</a><br/>
have probably noticed the new short form there of our descriptive identity<br/>
  compliments of yahoo & bill  i hope & trust<br/>
as well as our perhaps more familiar long form of it just below that<br/>
<br/>
&  i may be a little out of school here  but i am wondering<br/>
  since there appears to be room for a few more words up top at least<br/>
whether there isnt a brief but telling addition that might be adopted to<br/>
acknowledge & encourage not only all the pointheads<br/>
  who are perhaps already all too encouraged<br/>
but also all us lineheads & boundary freaks at large<br/>
as well as all us clavophiles &or areaheads  equally<br/>
<br/>
but what does anybody think about that<br/>
<br/>
or perhaps a whole nother referendum is in order<br/>
<br/>
i dont know<br/>
<br/>
er<br/>
<br/>
but i mean like who do you think we are anyway<br/>
<br/>
m</div>