also
it appears from this admittedly funky looking map
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/ae/Krajina_ethnic_map.jpg
which comes from this possibly inaccurate article
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/ae/Krajina_ethnic_map.jpg
that the position of hrhurs may simply depend on
whether one accepts the reality of the political
integration of baranja with croatia in 1997
& while this 2004 united nations map doesnt directly
acknowledge it
oddly enough
http://www.un.org/Depts/Cartographic/map/profile/eastcroa.pdf
i get the impression that even if the fact may still
be deplored by serbia
its reality isnt actually disputed by anyone
which may well explain why some version of the
croatian version is so widely accepted
even if not necessarily always the same version of it
also
& again for whatever it may be worth
since this detail might only have been due to a slip
of the pen or of the mind anyway
the above baranja map shows the hrrs border deflecting
westward from the veliki canal just below the tripoint
& thus projects the tripoint slightly westward from
the canal too
also
the text of the treaty of trianon is no particular
help on the hungarian border either without the
proceedings or maps of the boundary commission it set
up
so we are still about equally in the dark regarding
all 3 convergents
all in all
a most peculiar void for the middle of europe
--- aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...> wrote:
> finally comes a hrhurs map i would seriously
> entertain
> saluting
> on the last page here
>
http://www.dur.ac.uk/resources/ibru/resources/borderlines/borderlines1.pdf
> in an ad for a treatise presumably explaining its
> selection in full
>
> & tho this map appears to show one of the croatian
> versions of the tripoint position on the veliki
> canal
> rather than the serbian version on the danube river
> the answer to why it depicts or even prefers this
> particular position would cost me more euros than i
> own
>
> also
> tho this map is sufficiently authoritative it is not
> sufficiently detailed
> & one may even notice some slight inaccuracies in it
> when compared to the satpic
>
> but still it is highly gratifying to see the hrhurs
> depiction it shows so obviously close to both the
> tripoint stretcher guess & the pushpin guess that
> can
> be seen again at bottom here
>
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.culture.discuss.boundary-point/9473
>
> probably closer to the tripoint stretcher based on
> the
> croatian zoomable map tho it is hard to be sure
>
> & in fact my own fresh look at this satpic in
> morning
> light & with more confident eyes perceives a highly
> suggestive veggie line running from the danube to
> the
> canal
> which appears to meet at the oxbow saddle about 100
> meters below the pushpin
>
> a visible trace of the hungarian border
> perhaps
>
> so that position at the oxbow junction point
> for those reasons
> may well become a new second or best guess
> & it is therefore recorded in the attached revised
> tripoint stretcher
> or rather tripoint stretcher stretcher
> since it actually restretches the previous stretch
> to indicate between the little red squares the full
> range of at least the likeliest croatian version of
> the truth
>
> but of course if anyone happens to own this ibru
> publication & can extract the relevant discussion &
> data for us
> well then that would be better still
>
>
>
>
__________________________________________________________________________________________
> Check out the New Yahoo! Mail - Fire up a more
> powerful email and get things done faster.
> (http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta)
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
We have the perfect Group for you. Check out the handy changes to Yahoo! Groups
(http://groups.yahoo.com)