Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] DENL pictures from Dinxpeerlo<br/>
Date: Mar 14, 2001 @ 11:59<br/>
Author: Peter Smaardijk (Peter Smaardijk &lt;peter.smaardijk@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="1747.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="1751.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic1698.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="1747.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="1749.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1840518923">I think (but Wolfgang, I&#39;d appreciate it if you can confirm or deny this) that picture 2 is the back of<br/>
picture 1. The coat-of-arms on picture 2 is definitely the Dutch province of Overijssel.<br/>
<br/>
Peter S.<br/>
<br/>
Peter Smaardijk wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt; Your first picture, with no. 1 (862), I can now, with the help of your pdf file and a good map (Dutch<br/>
&gt; topo map 1:25k), positively identify as the old tripoint &#39;Kingdom of the Netherlands - Kingdom of Prussia<br/>
&gt; - Kingdom of Hanover&#39;. It is near the Dutch village of Overdinkel, in Overijssel province.<br/>
&gt; Dutch border stones at the Prussian side are numbered 1 to 862. No. 1 was at what is now defrlu, and no.<br/>
&gt; 193 is bedenl. North of 862, the numbering starts all over again, since it was the Dutch-Hanoverian<br/>
&gt; boundary there.<br/>
&gt; The stone is older than the time it became a tripoint, I think. Still don&#39;t know what coat-of-arms it is.<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; Peter S. </span></blockquote></div>