Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] DENL pictures from Dinxpeerlo<br/>
Date: Mar 14, 2001 @ 10:31<br/>
Author: Peter Smaardijk (Peter Smaardijk &lt;peter.smaardijk@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="1717.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="1747.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic1698.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="1745.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="1747.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1399843909">Note that the coat-of-arms of pictures 1 and 2 are different and not Gueldrian/Muenster ones!<br/>
I will try to find out what they represent.<br/>
<br/>
Peter S.<br/>
<br/>
michael donner wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt; utterly staggering rocks  gartner<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; the dated examples from 1766<br/>
&gt; & yikes even 1753 in pix 8 & 9<br/>
&gt; are the oldest i have ever seen dated<br/>
&gt; unless you can confirm that the date 1619 in pic 1 is correct & original<br/>
&gt;   for that one really leaves me gasping<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; i mean it looks credible stylistically if perhaps a bit too finely dressed<br/>
&gt; for the period<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; so can you or anyone say about this<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; or place these rocks definitively on borders thru time up to the present<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; for they are looking like favorites now in the old stone derby<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; m </span></blockquote></div>