Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] various responses<br/>
Date: Jan 08, 2001 @ 20:29<br/>
Author: Jesper & Nicolette Nielsen (&quot;Jesper & Nicolette Nielsen&quot; &lt;jesniel@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="1248.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next&emsp;[<a href="topic1248.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="1254.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="1256.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1785724125">Peter is a great friend of mine, but on this one I will disagree until proved wrong. Both map and photo show a condomination. The map do however also show sort of a border line in the river (perhaps with some kind of marker).<br/>
<br/>
But hey without disagreement there would be no discussion, and if all mankind all agreed on everything there wouldn&#39;t been borders at all.<br/>
<br/>
Jesper<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt; by the same token of truth<br/>
&gt; i think that the 1971 map of defrlu you just posted should be considered<br/>
&gt; very probably outdated by comparison with the much newer looking one posted<br/>
&gt; by gartner & jesper<br/>
&gt; which does show the delu joint zone<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; it is true that the river condos suggested by barry & reiterated elsewhere<br/>
&gt; are not mentioned by gideon<br/>
&gt; but gideon is frequently very simplistic & sketchy about his particulars<br/>
&gt;   as you can see by comparing his tp details to those i lifted from brownlie<br/>
&gt;     just as an example<br/>
&gt; & gideons info could also be older than gartners & barrys too<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; so i think we have to allow for the possibility that either point of view<br/>
&gt; may yet prove to be the present legal truth here<br/>
&gt; as well as at bedelu<br/>
&gt; & perhaps even at other euro river tripoints<br/>
&gt; </span></blockquote></div>