Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Fragments
Date: Jan 07, 2001 @ 23:40
Author: Brendan Whyte ("Brendan Whyte" <brwhyte@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


This is the subject of an unpublished paper of mine:

A fragment is any discontinuous/discontiguous part of a territorial unit
(county/ state/ country/ supranational entity.

Thus Greece is a fragment of the EU, Alaska and Hawaii of the US and Santa
Catalina of California. It can be an island or just a piece of territory
separated because another is in the way (ie Alaska).

Fragments can be subdivided into different classes:
enclaves are one of those.
An enclave is a piece of territory 100% surrounded by one other territory.
Thus it has one neighbour and no coast.
Alaska on the other hand has one neighbour and a coast
Kaliningrad has 2 neighbours and a coast
Nakhichevan (part of Azerbaijan) has 3 neighbours and no coast.

I personally find no point in distinguishing enclave and exclavce at Catudal
and robinson do, as the terms are ambiguous when qualified.
"French enclave" can mean a foreign thing in France or a French thing in
someone else. Thus when tlaking about Llivia, it can be called a "French
enclave", "Spanish enclave", "French exclave" and "Spanish exclave"which is
clearly confusing, ambiguous and redundant.
While I would like to use the terms for different things, redefining
osmething like that is too tricky given how sloppy most people are with
'enclave' today.
Further, the german word for enclave is exklave, so we may as well treat
them as synonyms and be done with it.

Brendan



>From: "Jesper & Nicolette Nielsen" <jesniel@...>
>Reply-To: BoundaryPoint@egroups.com
>To: <BoundaryPoint@egroups.com>
>Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Fragments
>Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 16:41:34 +0100
>
>Will anybody please define fragtments again vs. enclaves and exclaves!
>
>Jesper

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com