Jesper,
The print date of my map is 1995. Since your map is newer,
I suppose it should contain the best information. Too bad...
Here is a (bad-quality hand-scanned) image:
http://www.geocities.com/exclaves/BiQuad_Candidate.gif
By the way, did y'all see:
http://www.icj-cij.org/icjwww/idecisions/isummaries/ibnlsummary590620.htm
(Perhaps it's old news to most of you...)
Mats
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jesper & Nicolette Nielsen [mailto:jesniel@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 22:20
> To: mats@...
> Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Quadripoints in Baarle
>
>
> Mats
>
> according to my (Peters) 1:8300 Baarle map all of the pink
> main road is hatched. Donkerstraat looks also to be all
> Belgium apart from a tiny part of the last road connection to
> Molenstraat.
>
> If we have the same map - notice that the red (hatch) line
> that goes through the world Donkerstraat continues through
> all the way through. I also see two red (hatch) lines in
> between the enclaves.
>
> However I don't trust the tourist map's 100% accuracy.
>
> Checking a third Baarle map 1:25000 don't answer the
> question. This one do show the triangle as Dutch, but the
> road is not marked to any country.
>
> Jesper
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mats Hessman" <Mats@...>
> To: <BoundaryPoint@egroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 10:04 PM
> Subject: RE: [BoundaryPoint] Quadripoints in Baarle
>
>
> > > I have a tourist Baarle Map 1:8300. It's named "plattegrond"
> > > from 1999. The Belgium part is hatched. I see the triangle
> > > and inverted U-shape. As I see the map the road
> > > Molenstraat/Turnhoutsweg is all Belgium and therefore not a
> > > bi-quadro.
> >
> > Are you quite sure? I think I am looking at the same map.
> > Mine is 1:8300 and the Belgian fragments are hatched in a
> > red (hard-to-read) color.
> >
> > On my map the Molenstraat seems to be part of the triangular
> > Dutch shape, i. e. the part of Molenstraat that runs through the
> > triangle is not hatched, thus Dutch, on my map.
> >
> > My triangle is actually a polygon with four corners, looking
> > a lot but not quite, like a triangle, the fourth corner
> > apparently connecting to the inverted U-shape.
> >
> > I'd say there is definately a bi-quadro candidate to be
> > investigated in situ, if anyone should happen to pass by.
> >
> > Let's hear what our new brother Wolfgang has to say about it.
> >
> > Thank you for the description of your other candidates!
> >
> > Mats
> >
> > * * * BoundaryPoint shortcuts * * *
> > Post new message: BoundaryPoint@egroups.com
> > Subscribe: BoundaryPoint-subscribe@egroups.com
> > Unsubscribe: BoundaryPoint-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> > List owner: BoundaryPoint-owner@egroups.com
> > URL to main page: http://www.egroups.com/group/BoundaryPoint
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> * * * BoundaryPoint shortcuts * * *
> Post new message: BoundaryPoint@egroups.com
> Subscribe: BoundaryPoint-subscribe@egroups.com
> Unsubscribe: BoundaryPoint-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> List owner: BoundaryPoint-owner@egroups.com
> URL to main page: http://www.egroups.com/group/BoundaryPoint
>
>