Subject: RE: [BoundaryPoint] Quadripoints in Baarle<br/>
Date: Jan 02, 2001 @ 21:04<br/>
Author: Mats Hessman (Mats Hessman &lt;Mats@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="1173.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="1177.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic1169.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="1174.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="1176.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1876918383"><blockquote><span title="ireply">&gt; I have a tourist Baarle Map 1:8300. It&#39;s named &quot;plattegrond&quot; <br/>
&gt; from 1999. The Belgium part is hatched. I see the triangle <br/>
&gt; and inverted U-shape. As I see the map the road <br/>
&gt; Molenstraat/Turnhoutsweg is all Belgium and therefore not a <br/>
&gt; bi-quadro. <br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Are you quite sure? I think I am looking at the same map. <br/>
Mine is 1:8300 and the Belgian fragments are hatched in a<br/>
red (hard-to-read) color.<br/>
<br/>
On my map the Molenstraat seems to be part of the triangular<br/>
Dutch shape, i. e. the part of Molenstraat that runs through the<br/>
triangle is not hatched, thus Dutch, on my map.<br/>
<br/>
My triangle is actually a polygon with four corners, looking <br/>
a lot but not quite, like a triangle, the fourth corner<br/>
apparently connecting to the inverted U-shape.<br/>
<br/>
I&#39;d say there is definately a bi-quadro candidate to be<br/>
investigated in situ, if anyone should happen to pass by.<br/>
<br/>
Let&#39;s hear what our new brother Wolfgang has to say about it.<br/>
<br/>
Thank you for the description of your other candidates!<br/>
<br/>
Mats</div>