10936. more ctri background
       http://tinyurl.com/gjlz fresh news account based on old boundary book traces ctri ruckus all the way back to pequot war of 1638 so my earlier characterization
       Jul 10, 2003 @ 16:15 - m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)
10944. Re: more ctri background
       One tweak: sometimes stone monuments don t predate ratification of a boundary - remember the 1853 marker remnant at MASW, or should I say MSSW? It marked a
       Jul 10, 2003 @ 23:25 - bjbutlerus ("bjbutlerus" <bjbutler@...>)
10945. Re: more ctri background
       yes good tweak tho the 1935 thru 1941 survey effort was never ratified by anyone hence triply unlikely to have gotten a vertical stone & i trust you still
       Jul 10, 2003 @ 23:53 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
10967. Re: more ctri background
       brian ... i keep remembering that excellent remnant & my marker balloon too but am still puzzling whether you should say mssw & if so why tho i was resting on
       Jul 13, 2003 @ 13:38 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)