Subject: Re: Poor border mapping example and straight borders
Date: Apr 19, 2003 @ 16:44
Author: Karolis B. ("Karolis B." <kbajoraz@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> ok thanxno no, not ten, more like five.
> so evidently we are talking more like 10km than 5km of straight
> border there
> which will be much harder to surpass even on plru
>of
> & i have to wonder then if it doesnt just boil down to a question
> whether 3 or more monuments in a row can ever be consideredhow lucky that there are only two on Curonian Spit!
> perfectly straight
> when we know they must always deflect off of one another by atIt depends on wether the border treaty gives priority to the
> least a few mils of a second of arc
> just owing to limitations of survey accuracy
>For any practical purposes such discrepancies are nothing.
> but since caus & egly were specifically mentioned as straight
> i think any series of practically straight monuments would qualify
>It wasn't Kevin's interpretation, I don't think, just an additional
> & this would make plru look pretty good in places i think
>
> but it is jespers question
> & his to decide which chains of practically straight monuments
> are acceptably sober
> & which too tipsy to qualify
>
> secondly
> this single clean cut of the curonian neck & beyond
> which i think you are indicating
> also produces an appreciably large straight fraction of all ltru
> suggesting kevins interpretation was correct
>
> in that event
> i cant help suggesting penon de velez de la gomera
> with its perfect single cut neck as entire border
> even tho i distinctly recall the question was only about europe
> if indeed it was the question