Subject: Re: Antarctica - Neutral Zones<br/>
Date: Apr 06, 2003 @ 16:27<br/>
Author: L. A. Nadybal (&quot;L. A. Nadybal&quot; &lt;lnadybal@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="9609.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="9611.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic9531.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="9609.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="9611.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-871245123">That was my understanding, that it only put claims in abeyance.... to<br/>
be fought over another day.<br/>
Len <br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> --- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, Kevin Meynell &lt;kevin@m...&gt; wrote:<br/>
&gt; Len,<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt;Well, if they signed the treaty then their claims have to be null<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; The Antarctic Treaty doesn&#39;t recognise, but neither does it<br/>
de-recognise <br/>
&gt; pre-existing national claims.<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; Regards,<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; Kevin Meynell </span></blockquote></div>