Subject: [No Subject]
Date: Feb 24, 2003 @ 22:01
Author: Francisco <xuax@netvisao.pt> ("Francisco <xuax@...>" <xuax@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


Kevin Meynell <kevin@m...> wrote:
> and there are some problematic definitions such as Cyprus, Georgia
and Armenia being put into Asia.
> the Canary Islands are more of a problem as they're considered
integrated parts of Spain, whilst they should be really be included
under Africa.
"anorak222 <listen@w...>" <listen@w...> wrote:
> I think the point is that the concept of continents is a cultural
convention.
> All the ambiguities aside, continents ought to be geographic
entities, and political borders should not be criteria at all.

Hello!
Do the open sea islands are parts of continents? As geographic
entities we could not say so. As a cultural convention, maybe. Or we
may say that an island belongs to the nearest continent. In strict
geographic view, the Canary Islands are obviously part of the
African continent, at the same time being integrated in an European
country. Further off shore, the nearest continent to Madeira Islands
is also Africa, but the islands are clearly part of cultural Europe.
Going deeper, some of the Azores islands belong to the European
tectonic plate, while some belong to the North American plate.
Latin America is clearly a case of cultural convention, which could
be called a cultural continent. USA and Canada are North America.
Mexico is more than North America, it is Latin America too.
Geographically Mexico is in North America; culturally it is in South
(Latin) America.

Francisco Santos
Portugal