Kevin Meynell <kevin@m...> wrote:
 > and there are some problematic definitions such as Cyprus, Georgia 
 
and Armenia being put into Asia.
 > the Canary Islands are more of a problem as they're considered 
 
integrated parts of Spain, whilst they should be really be included 
under Africa.
"anorak222 <listen@w...>" <listen@w...> wrote:
 > I think the point is that the concept of continents is a cultural 
 
convention. 
 > All the ambiguities aside, continents ought to be geographic 
 
entities, and political borders should not be criteria at all.
Hello!
Do the open sea islands are parts of continents? As geographic 
entities we could not say so. As a cultural convention, maybe. Or we 
may say that an island belongs to the nearest continent. In strict 
geographic view, the Canary Islands are obviously part of the 
African continent, at the same time being integrated in an European 
country. Further off shore, the nearest continent to Madeira Islands 
is also Africa, but the islands are clearly part of cultural Europe. 
Going deeper, some of the Azores islands belong to the European 
tectonic plate, while some belong to the North American plate.
Latin America is clearly a case of cultural convention, which could 
be called a cultural continent. USA and Canada are North America. 
Mexico is more than North America, it is Latin America too. 
Geographically Mexico is in North America; culturally it is in South 
(Latin) America.
Francisco Santos
Portugal