Subject: Boundary line change may have affected crabbers detected in Russia
Date: Feb 12, 2003 @ 20:53
Author: John Seeliger ("John Seeliger" <jseelige@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


http://www.peninsulaclarion.com/stories/013103/ala_013103ala0010001.shtml

Boundary line change may have affected crabbers detected in Russia



KODIAK (AP) -- A change in the 1867 maritime boundary line between the
United States and Russia may be the reason six Bering Sea crabbers were
detected fishing in Russian waters last week, according to federal
officials.

The six vessels were ordered to port by the Coast Guard on behalf of the
National Marines Fisheries Service.

The boundary line was moved as much as 14 miles east in 1991, one federal
officer estimated. Captains, using navigational programs linked to the
global positioning system, may have been plotting their positions from the
1867 line rather than the 1991 line.

''One possibility -- the software provider may have been at fault,'' Susan
Auer told the Kodiak Mirror on Thursday. Auer is senior enforcement attorney
for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

The six American vessels included the Alaskan Beauty of Kirkland, Wash.,
Fierce Allegiance of Edmonds, Wash., the Arctic Wind, Pacific Star, and
Ocean Olympic of Seattle and the Adventure of Petersburg.

The boats were fishing in the Bering Sea during the opilio, or snow crab,
season that closed Saturday.

The Adventure was ordered to St. Paul in the Pribilof Islands. Auer
indicated that crab from that boat may not be seized.

''Little if any of the crab from the Adventure was taken from Russian
waters,'' Auer said.

The portion of the catch seized will depend on how much crab federal
officials believe came from Russian waters.

NMFS hopes to finish investigations by the end of next week, an officer
said.

The five other boats were being offloaded in Dutch Harbor in the Aleutian
Islands.

A National Marine Fisheries Service spokesman said last week that the crab
would be sold and proceeds held until investigations of the possible
violations are completed. According to NMFS, an administrative law judge
could impose forfeiture of the catch and the forfeiture could then be
contested in Federal District Court.

The Coast Guard enforces the Lacey Act, which makes it illegal to import or
acquire fish taken in violation of a U.S. treaty or foreign law.