Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Jungholz connection is a point
Date: Nov 13, 2000 @ 15:08
Author: Brendan Whyte ("Brendan Whyte" <brwhyte@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
>_________________________________________________________________________
>This one is really bother Peter alot, and he is chasing the truth with
>zeal. So the last word is not said in this matter yet.
>
>For the new people, here is a scanned Jungholz-topomap.
>
>http://www.geocities.com/mafiapetedk/jungholz.jpg
>
>Jesper
>----- Original Message -----
>From: michael donner <m@...>
>To: <BoundaryPoint@egroups.com>
>Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2000 2:01 AM
>Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Jungholz connection is a point
>
>
> > here we go indeed
> >
> > this makes it conclusive at 3 unquestionable votes for a point as
>opposed
> > to 1 or 2 unquestionable votes against a point
> > i think
> > but i forget which
> >
> > at all events it will be wonderful to boogie up there for a look see
> >
> > m
> >
> >
> >
> > & compliments to andrew on his class a monogram too
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > >Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 16:39:57 +0100
> > >From: Andrew U. Frank <frank@...>
> > >To: 'David Mark' <dmark@...>
> > >Subject: RE: [BoundaryPoint] Jungholz - here we go !!! (fwd)
> > >
> > >dear david,
> > >i have it from a VERY RELIABLE source (i.e. the person in the ministry
> > >responsible for the boundary of austria): it is a point and there is no
> > >connection of any width. of course, there are practical matters ....
>but
> > >that is not the theory!
> > >
> > >a
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: David Mark [mailto:dmark@...]
> > >> Sent: Sunday, 05 November, 2000 00:39
> > >> To: Andrew Frank
> > >> Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Jungholz - here we go !!! (fwd)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > >> Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:13:14 -0400
> > >> From: michael donner <m@...>
> > >> Reply-To: BoundaryPoint@egroups.com
> > >> To: BoundaryPoint@egroups.com
> > >> Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Jungholz - here we go !!!
> > >>
> > >> yesss
> > >>
> > >> this is truly fantastic
> > >>
> > >> bottoms up
> > >>
> > >> & i see we are raising a chaser at int boundaries list today also
> > >> so thanxx & cheers again to you & martin too
> > >>
> > >> m
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> > Hi everybody - at last - the Jungholz mystery is solved
> > >> !!! Just got
> > >> >an e-mail from the Tourism office in Jungholz - they are
> > >> looking forward
> > >> >to welcoming the crazy guys from the GCEBE next year - and
> > >> informed me
> > >> >about the "gap" between J. and the rest of Austria: the gap is 3
> > >> >(three) meters wide - so J. IS connected to the mainland.
> > >> Let's take a
> > >> >look ourselves next year - 3 meters should be enough space
> > >> for a little
> > >> >dance...! For me it's an excuse for an extra scotch tonight
> > >> !!! - cheers
> > >> >!!! Peter