Subject: Re: octopoint? Translation<br/>
Date: Feb 04, 2003 @ 21:02<br/>
Author: Peter Smaardijk &lt;smaardijk@yahoo.com&gt; (&quot;Peter Smaardijk &lt;smaardijk@...&gt;&quot; &lt;smaardijk@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="8912.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="8915.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic8911.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="8912.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="8914.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1388511043">Arif Samad wrote:<br/>
&quot;(...)Anyway, what&#39;s up with the eighth commune?  Did it disappear, <br/>
because the eigth line seems to be different in my map, plus it does <br/>
not show up on 1:160,000 maps while the other seven does show up.  By<br/>
the way, the 1:200,000, 1:160,000 and 1:40,000 maps in the Finnish <br/>
site is based on 1:500,000, 1:400,000 and 1:20,000 map images <br/>
respectively.&quot;<br/>
<br/>
The eighth one doesn&#39;t figure in my Finnish road atlas, either, but <br/>
with the help of <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://opaskartta.turku.fi/index_eng.htm">http://opaskartta.turku.fi/index_eng.htm</a> and the <br/>
remark on the other site that Marcel found that the Masku <br/>
municipality part is an enclave (at least that&#39;s what I think it <br/>
says), the eighth part must be a detached part of that municipality. <br/>
When comparing all maps we now have here, it makes sense to me.<br/>
<br/>
Hopefully the fragment hasn&#39;t been abandoned recently.<br/>
<br/>
Peter S.</div>