Subject: Re: Satellite of possible aftmuz and/or aftjuz<br/>
Date: Jan 12, 2003 @ 01:20<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 &lt;orc@orcoast.com&gt; (&quot;acroorca2002 &lt;orc@...&gt;&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="8620.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next&emsp;[<a href="topic8470.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="8621.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="8623.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-775477922">--- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, &quot;Jesper Nielsen&quot; <br/>
&lt;jesniel@i...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; Could be aftmuz or aftjuz, or just aftj, afuz or aftm.<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; <br/>
 </span></blockquote><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.uwm.edu/Library/digilib/afghan/records/record_27.ht">http://www.uwm.edu/Library/digilib/afghan/records/record_27.ht</a><br/>
m<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt;<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>judging from the depth of the canyon<br/>
aftj seems most likely</div>