Subject: Re: PLh<br/>
Date: Dec 14, 2002 @ 17:57<br/>
Author: Grant Hutchison &lt;granthutchison@blueyond (&quot;Grant Hutchison &lt;granthutchison@...&gt;&quot; &lt;granthutchison@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="8347.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="8350.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic8311.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="8348.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="8350.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-563090134">--- In <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>, &quot;acroorca2002 &lt;orc@o...&gt;&quot; <br/>
&lt;orc@o...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; &gt; &gt; the montecristo tripoint is defined in the tripartite treaty as <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; the cerro or summit<br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; per ibs no 82<br/>
&gt; &gt; This is good. Can you point me at IBS #82, and the others?<br/>
&gt; <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.law.fsu.edu/library/collection/LimitsinSeas/index.php">http://www.law.fsu.edu/library/collection/LimitsinSeas/index.php</a><br/>
 </span></blockquote>Thanks. Looks a solid. My confidence would be unmodified by doubt if <br/>
only they hadn&#39;t got the height of Montecristo wrong by a factor of <br/>
two!<br/>
<br/>
The China/Russia doc on this site is a broken link. The <br/>
China/Mongolia file takes me no further forward, unfortunately. The <br/>
tripoint is described as being &quot;on the Kuiten spur&quot; of the Altai <br/>
range, and is elsewhere called to &quot;Taban Bogdo Ula tripoint&quot; - <br/>
Tavanbogd (&quot;Five Saints&quot;) is another name for Kujten Uul. But there&#39;s <br/>
nothing to really firm the tripoint on to the summit itself.<br/>
<br/>
Grant</div>