Subject: Re: PLh
Date: Dec 12, 2002 @ 15:06
Author: acroorca2002 <orc@orcoast.com> ("acroorca2002 <orc@...>" <orc@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


thanx harry
good show
& i wish you would do something about that naked nle extremity
just to run the whole table or gamut

but i find the change in nll owing to human activity most peculiar
because i know highpointers at least wont usually consider
artificial constructions but only the natural surface of the earth

so i can imagine them at least either objecting or not objecting to
this new nll
depending on what mood they are in

my own opinion is that the human actions that create the bounds
& areas of countries & those that create construction are all
perfectly natural alike
so i would agree wholeheartedly with your call & your change in
nll

but then by the same token why would the highest skyscraper in
amsterdam not qualify for nlh

yes i know we have been here before
but perhaps it is considerations like these that make compiling
reliable vertical extremity rosters so difficult

--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Harry ten Veen"
<pa8km@a...> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > i dont know how accurate it is
>
> I only know NL-low. The one on the website is no longer valid.
>
http://home.planet.nl/~veenhh/borderland/nederland/pa-extreme
s.htm
>
> Thanks for that nice link anyway. New sources of inspiration.
>
> gl
> Harry ten Veen