Subject: Re: Somewhat accurate Madha?<br/>
Date: Nov 28, 2002 @ 20:14<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="8158.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="8160.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic8115.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="8158.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="8160.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1396408861">yes naanu<br/>
one safe haven<br/>
yes thats our main topic<br/>
a wonderful idea<br/>
& i couldnt have put it better myself<br/>
<br/>
but as all of us aboriginal multipointers here realized long ago<br/>
even with our de jure establishment of the real bp topic<br/>
we could never de facto keep our precious haven safe from <br/>
digressors<br/>
<br/>
thankfully our borders are just too open for that<br/>
<br/>
& as gerald ford told me at brunch the morning after the capitol <br/>
was bombed by domestic madmen<br/>
its ok to disagree so long as youre not disagreeable<br/>
<br/>
but anyway<br/>
in light of our long tradition of free association<br/>
i would agree with mile in message 8155 regarding your own <br/>
digressions into politics from our de facto topic of borders<br/>
digressions not only in your remarks about macedonia <br/>
but in several of your other recent messages as well<br/>
while i have to wonder about your own insistence on not being <br/>
digressed upon by others<br/>
<br/>
in this our safe haven of everyones land<br/>
inoffensive digressors including even happy drunks etc have not <br/>
only been allowed but welcome <br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> --- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;I M Naanu&quot; &lt;imnaanu@y...&gt; wrote:<br/>
&gt; Thanks Kevin<br/>
&gt; Never had any much interest in that topic anyway.<br/>
&gt; Don&#39;t want to digress from our main topic on this forum- one <br/>
safe <br/>
&gt; haven in a mad world.<br/>
&gt; Bye <br/>
&gt; IMN<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; --- In BoundaryPoint@y..., Kevin Meynell &lt;kevin@m...&gt; wrote:<br/>
&gt; &gt; Hi,<br/>
&gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt;I have heard other stories about the 3 wise men, but they <br/>
are<br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt;somewhat different and Eastern in origin, not probably <br/>
acceptable <br/>
&gt; by<br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt;a modern christian.<br/>
&gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; At the risk of digressing from the boundary issues, the bible <br/>
never <br/>
&gt; &gt; mentioned the number of wise men, their names, nor pretty <br/>
much <br/>
&gt; anything <br/>
&gt; &gt; about what the Christian world has largely come to accept as <br/>
fact. <br/>
&gt; Most of <br/>
&gt; &gt; these so-called facts were actually made-up hundreds of <br/>
years <br/>
&gt; later, so I <br/>
&gt; &gt; would say the stories you&#39;ve heard are probably just as <br/>
acceptable <br/>
&gt; as the <br/>
&gt; &gt; ones I heard in my childhood.<br/>
&gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; Cheers,<br/>
&gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; Kevin Meynell </span></blockquote></div>