Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Gideon on Jungholz<br/>
Date: Oct 20, 2000 @ 18:00<br/>
Author: michael donner (michael donner &lt;m@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="805.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="832.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic805.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="807.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="809.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-281393477">gid question<br/>
but not a peep from him on this<br/>
<br/>
he is well within his editorial license to simplify here in any case<br/>
<br/>
yet his silence may lend a bit more credence to the narrow neck school<br/>
  i would concede<br/>
while not yet willing to give up on the authenticity of brendans boundary<br/>
cross data in message 665 any more than on peters narrow passage data in<br/>
message 730<br/>
<br/>
thinking about this again makes me wonder tho<br/>
could it be we have simply bumbled into an ancient & friendly rivalry here<br/>
between the postmistress & the tourism lady<br/>
over a truth as abstruse as the dichotomies of particle physics<br/>
& very effective too for attracting visitors in for a look see<br/>
<br/>
m<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt;<br/>
&gt;Does Giddy mention Jungholz?<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;Jesper </span></blockquote></div>