Subject: Fwd: Re: ltplru Revisited
Date: Nov 15, 2002 @ 13:56
Author: m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


>From: "Karolis B" <kbajoras@...>
>To: BoundaryPoint-owner@yahoogroups.com
for some strange reason
i have been receiving emails from our lithuanian members
which were most probably intended as bp postings
so i will be forwarding these without further comment
beginning with the following

>Subject: Re: ltplru Revisited
>Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 08:45:03 -0000
>
> > The bend of the ltru boundary on the map is not correct, but I
>made it in
> > order to correct the boundary according to the situation of the
>tripoint.
> > According to the boundary treaty the present tripoint is located on
>the
> > spot, but according to my measures and understanding, then the
>present ltru
> > boundary up to the border fence must be located some 5 meters
>inside Russia.
> > Anyhow, this is not very important. This boundary is not yet
>demarcated.
> > After the Kaliningrad agreement, and Lithuania's most likely
>affirmative
> > respond, this work maybe soon will continue. GBBE must hurry on in
>order to
> > see the Vistytis farms!
> >
> > Jan
>
>Jan,
>I think that it could be that on that map in your page the LTRU
>boundary might be shown a couple degrees too steepley to the NE, but
>there was probably no need to draw a new border. Like I mentioned
>before to you, it could be that the Russian sand strip along which we
>went from the fence to the tp might actually start well into Russia
>and then go diagnoaly to SE almost to the tp. In that case, the
>barbed wire that tore my pants is justful punishment for such an
>agressive intrusion into RU:))
>It couold be that south of Lake Vistytis LT-RU and LSSR-RSFSR border
>is identical, so it doesn't matter at which one we look.
>To get the really real border location, we gotta draw a line from the
>tp (54� 21' 47,8" N 22� 47' 31,2"E, according to your gps) to X -
>6028563; Y - 4616421 (point 1, in the LTRU border treaty). Now if
>somebody knew how to convert this to WGS84, that would be great! The
>line, accoring to the treaty, is supposed to be 600 m long.
>I'm also not sure if you drew the border fence in the righ place. Are
>you sure that you took corrdinates 216 and 217 on the fence and where
>exactly was 217?
>
>Karolis


_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus