Subject: Re: CAUS -- Peace Arch Photos<br/>
Date: Nov 05, 2002 @ 17:20<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="7767.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="7769.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic7734.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="7767.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="7769.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1640928197">thanx kevin<br/>
nor did i mean to imply diversions & excursions are unwelcome <br/>
or inappropriate here<br/>
far from it<br/>
so far as i am concerned anyway<br/>
<br/>
at the very least they provide good contrast value & variety<br/>
& they do help sharpen our focal point by adding range<br/>
& they are frequently intrinsically diverting too<br/>
<br/>
just as we rejoice to find our clavers embedded here<br/>
& our ghosters hovering around<br/>
& even our philatelists adhesive<br/>
so must there be an honored place in everyones land for all our <br/>
arrant bounders & even our peribounders<br/>
<br/>
so please dont be so quick to take your business elsewhere<br/>
& that goes for everyone<br/>
<br/>
indeed i believe <br/>
in our entire history<br/>
we have only discouraged a couple of spammers<br/>
& that may even have been an anomaly<br/>
<br/>
regards<br/>
m <br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> --- In BoundaryPoint@y..., Kevin Meynell &lt;kevin@m...&gt; wrote:<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt;when so many have been treating us to so much about so <br/>
little<br/>
&gt; &gt;that is even remotely multipunctilious<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; Apologies for being one of those responsible for diverting from <br/>
the <br/>
&gt; point(s) ;-)  Does anyone know of another list where it would be <br/>
more <br/>
&gt; appropriate to discuss periborderal issues?<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; Regards,<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; Kevin Meynell </span></blockquote></div>