Subject: Re: Estonian martime border<br/>
Date: Oct 11, 2002 @ 00:44<br/>
Author: kbajoras (&quot;kbajoras&quot; &lt;kbajoras@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="7578.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="7580.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic7571.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="7578.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="7580.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-332235902">Ok, but EEZ&#39;s are not territories of and don&#39;t come under the <br/>
sovereignty of their respective countries, so I wouldn&#39;t consider an <br/>
EEZ tripoint to be an international tripoint...<br/>
<br/>
CIA info<br/>
Estonia:<br/>
Maritime claims: exclusive economic zone:  limits fixed in <br/>
coordination with neighboring states <br/>
<br/>
territorial sea:  12 NM  <br/>
<br/>
Finland<br/>
Maritime claims: continental shelf:  200-m depth or to the depth of <br/>
exploitation <br/>
<br/>
exclusive fishing zone:  12 NM <br/>
<br/>
territorial sea:  12 NM (in the Gulf of Finland - 3 NM)  <br/>
<br/>
<br/>
Russia<br/>
Maritime claims: continental shelf:  200-m depth or to the depth of <br/>
exploitation <br/>
<br/>
exclusive economic zone:  200 NM <br/>
<br/>
territorial sea:  12 NM  <br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
So based on territorial claims of 12NM from Estonia and Russia and <br/>
only 3 NM from Finland it seems like there is no EEFIRU marine tp.<br/>
Now, economic zones must colide, I will bet.</div>