Subject: Re: Tp3<br/>
Date: Sep 07, 2002 @ 14:11<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="7155.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="7171.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic7146.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="7160.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="7162.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1703856810">--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;Jan S. Krogh&quot; &lt;jan.krogh@t...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; Well, it depends how to count ;-)  It stands that «2 counties <br/>
 </span></blockquote>(amter) and 3<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; municipalities (kommuner) meet». (Two of the municipalities belong <br/>
 </span></blockquote>to one<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; county and the third to the other.)<br/>
&gt; Maybe it really is a quaternary quintipoint, m?!?<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>ahh thanx jan<br/>
<br/>
your info then seems to indicate that this is a tertiary tripoint <br/>
upon a secondary boundary line<br/>
& not really a homogeneous quintipoint<br/>
<br/>
so it is just like a binational tripoint<br/>
say like caus2abbcmt for example <br/>
which is also not really a quintipoint tho 5 entities are involved<br/>
<br/>
& being just like it but a full step lower<br/>
it is evidently of the type dk2aabb3ccddee<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
also in answer to jespers question about other living examples<br/>
there is a tree that grew up around the us2arlatx marker<br/>
but the tree is not the tripoint marker<br/>
for the marker is still the marker tho surrounded by the tree<br/>
a big distinction<br/>
<br/>
& the example harry just added of a tree that memorializes a ghost <br/>
tripoint isnt really a marker either<br/>
for in that case there is no working marker<br/>
for an also big distinction<br/>
<br/>
but if this tree of jespers really is literally the tripoint marker<br/>
then that is big news<br/>
& the question arises & remains <br/>
where is the exact tripoint then<br/>
<br/>
is the tripoint really the entire tree<br/>
a dubious idea<br/>
or just the entire trunk everywhere it rises<br/>
a slightly better idea but still problematic<br/>
or only the entire trunk at ground level in cross section<br/>
still better but still not a point<br/>
or is it only the exact center of the trunk at ground level such as <br/>
might be indicated by the tree rings<br/>
etc <br/>
etc<br/>
& how will we know<br/>
<br/>
m</div>