Subject: Re: Tripoints list or map<br/>
Date: May 01, 2002 @ 22:56<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="6380.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next&emsp;[<a href="topic6378.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="6380.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="6382.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-589811405">yes <br/>
there were a few unresolved problems with the maps in message 371<br/>
which you can begin to look for by counting up the blue dots on each<br/>
continent & then comparing the apparent continental totals there with<br/>
those given in message 1086<br/>
<br/>
africa 57 vs 59<br/>
europe 43 vs 45<br/>
asia   45 vs 43<br/>
without getting into the details that produce the differences<br/>
but just falling back on the data in message 1086<br/>
which were at least carefully double checked by human beings<br/>
<br/>
the differences are all easily understandable<br/>
as you will see if you study them in detail <br/>
but they all do seem to arise from lapses of one sort or another in<br/>
the data or program producing the maps<br/>
<br/>
m<br/>
<br/>
--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;Jesper & Nicolette Nielsen&quot; &lt;jesniel@i...&gt;<br/>
wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt; Incomplete. Are you sure?<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; Jesper<br/>
&gt;   a try at a map of the continental ones was made in message 371 <br/>
&gt;   but was left incomplete </span></blockquote></div>