Subject: Re: Offshoot query<br/>
Date: Mar 29, 2002 @ 17:55<br/>
Author: lnadybal (&quot;lnadybal&quot; &lt;lnadybal@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="5992.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="5994.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic5965.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="5992.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="5994.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-158784051">OK... I&#39;ll rephrase the question again....<br/>
<br/>
Are there two pieces of Brunei really separated by Malaysia, or is <br/>
Brunei one piece of land over which it has sovereignty, some of <br/>
which is submerged?<br/>
<br/>
LN<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> --- In BoundaryPoint@y..., David Mark &lt;dmark@g...&gt; wrote:<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; The entire earth&#39;s crust is &quot;one piece of land, some of which is<br/>
&gt; submerged&quot;.<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; David<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, lnadybal wrote:<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; Ooohkay.<br/>
&gt; &gt; Let me rephrase the question: Are there two pieces of Brunei <br/>
really <br/>
&gt; &gt; separated by Malaysia, or is Brunei one piece of land, some of <br/>
which <br/>
&gt; &gt; is submerged?<br/>
&gt; &gt; LN <br/>
&gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; --- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@o...&gt; wrote:<br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; --- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;lnadybal&quot; &lt;lnadybal@c...&gt; wrote:<br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; Are the two pieces of Brunei really separated by Malaysia, or <br/>
are <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; they <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; perhaps connected by territorial seas?<br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; both to be sure<br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; but what was this entire reiterative offshoot discussion about<br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; claves if by land but not if by sea this time around<br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; & well but what exactly do we mean by if by<br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; etc etc<br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; ok but we could streamline & simplify it & all subsequent <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; reiterations by just realizing once & for all that things & <br/>
their <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; shapes are by nature & very commonly either continuous or <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; discontinuous <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; & only in very rare really interesting cases like jungholz are <br/>
they <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; both at once<br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; indeed thats the only situation where punctology enters into <br/>
&gt; &gt; clavology<br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; or of course if a clave happens to have a gratuitous tripoint <br/>
like <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; cabinda<br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; but otherwise this discussion is another try of sorts & so to <br/>
that <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; extent it sorta fits in here but it is not about pointing at all<br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; oh yes & remember too you may or may not be counting water as <br/>
real <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; estate in your tries depending on your taste <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; but water is really just as real as dry land<br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; again speaking punctologically at least<br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; m<br/>
&gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt;  <br/>
&gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to <br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/</a> <br/>
&gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; </span></blockquote></div>