Subject: Re: BEFRLU<br/>
Date: Mar 14, 2002 @ 22:09<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="5879.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="20009.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic3975.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="5886.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="5888.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-646987330"><blockquote><span title="qreply">--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &lt;marcelmiquel@n...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<br/>
I don&#39;t know if the tripoint will be changed.<br/>
<br/>
i believe jespers government informants indicated that the treaty <br/>
didnt apply to the tripoint but only to a sector of the frlu boundary <br/>
very near it<br/>
hence evidently no change should be expected in befrlu per se<br/>
m </span></blockquote></div>