Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Continental Borders II
Date: Feb 17, 2002 @ 07:08
Author: Franc Van Diest ("Franc Van Diest" <franc@vdiest.nl>)
Prev Post in Topic Next
Prev Post in Time Next
----- Original Message -----From: acroorca2002Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 7:59 PMSubject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Continental Bordersdade city fl
hi franc
we have discussed this but your input is timely & gets to the whole
question better than ever before
i think it is fair to sum up our previous tries as follows
we found no official indices nor any compelling reasons to distinguish
the several socalled continents & their divisions
however
& just to underscore the artificiality of the entire matter
we did find that there is some consensus that the panama & suez canals
do the job best
as do the watercourses generally thereafter
& thirdly the international divides as in the aegean
& finally the heights of land as in the urals
the trickiest part of all has appeared to fall in the brief
segment between the ural river & the ural mountains
since the river doesnt fall precisely from the divide
& there it seems no objective standard can be found for drawing that
short sector of the line
but it hardly matters except among us enthusiasts
m
actually i stopped at the first computer i could find to give a report
as soon as i realized that the hamlet of lacoochee in the
withlacoochee forest has evidently been merged with the nearby hamlet
of trilby to form trilacoochee
anyway it seemed important & i guess thats right