Subject: Re: Mt Paektu<br/>
Date: Jan 26, 2002 @ 23:07<br/>
Author: granthutchison (&quot;granthutchison&quot; &lt;granthutchison@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="5458.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="5466.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic5433.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="5460.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="5462.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-2091924278"><blockquote><span title="ireply">&gt; i think i understand this esthetic<br/>
&gt; & why you dearly love it<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; it is try pointing at its grandest<br/>
 </span></blockquote>But incompetentest, since I said &quot;feet&quot; when I meant &quot;metres&quot; - I sent<br/>
a quick correction but it has disappeared into Yahoo limbo these last<br/>
24 hours.<br/>
That lovely image of the Guyana-Brazil-Venezuela tripoint marker<br/>
raises another, similar problem. Roraima is the highest point in<br/>
Guyana, but not in Brazil or Venezuela. The marker (from the picture<br/>
and accompanying text) obviously isn&#39;t at the highest point of<br/>
Roraima, so now I wonder if that Guyanese highest point is the top of<br/>
Roraima, or if the top lies in one of the other countries, leaving<br/>
some lesser height to Guyana.<br/>
<br/>
Grant</div>