Subject: Re: nutatx & conutx & chnmso<br/>
Date: Jan 03, 2002 @ 20:04<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="5221.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next&emsp;[<a href="topic5214.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="5222.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="5224.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1659593668">still carrizo springs<br/>
<br/>
was feeling unsatisfied after finishing with the local library & <br/>
these recent posts so i continued to scratch around this small town <br/>
for my last reasonable hope<br/>
namely a delorme texas atlas<br/>
<br/>
when i reached the walmart & their  satisfaction guaranteed  sign <br/>
i already knew i would have a fair chance to make my points<br/>
for they had the 25dollar delorme<br/>
which i feel is the best available bet<br/>
& it showed not only that we had truly made chcotx at least class e <br/>
as in exray on new era day<br/>
but more to the present points it agreed absolutely with rand mcnally <br/>
about both conutx & nutatx<br/>
& even gave more detail about the latter<br/>
so we are suddenly quite viable on both these lovely points<br/>
however still potentially difficult they may be<br/>
<br/>
& better yet jc also found a 9dollar camera that takes those super <br/>
wide angle shots so you may consider us heavily armed & grandiose<br/>
m<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> --- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@o...&gt; wrote:<br/>
&gt; --- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@o...&gt; wrote:<br/>
&gt; &gt; --- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@o...&gt; wrote:<br/>
&gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; i will check topozone after i post this message but so far it <br/>
&gt; looks <br/>
&gt; &gt; &gt; like the usgs has little interest or ability to show such points<br/>
&gt; &gt; <br/>
&gt; &gt; yikes<br/>
&gt; &gt; its worse than i thought<br/>
&gt; &gt; usgs gives conutx but not nutatx<br/>
&gt; &gt; moreover the usgs conutx is a couple of miles from the otherwise <br/>
&gt; more <br/>
&gt; &gt; credible rand mcnally conutx<br/>
&gt; &gt; m<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; but now i also see that usgs gives chnmso at about the same place <br/>
as <br/>
&gt; rand mcnally gives it<br/>
&gt; or about 5 miles west of the continental divide at mxush<br/>
&gt; so at least that chnmso tripoint is looking a bit more probable<br/>
&gt; even if the nuevo leon tripoints are still unconfirmed<br/>
&gt; m </span></blockquote></div>