Subject: nutatx & conutx<br/>
Date: Jan 03, 2002 @ 18:07<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="5219.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="5221.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic5214.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="5219.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="5221.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-799882028">--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@o...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; i will check topozone after i post this message but so far it looks <br/>
&gt; like the usgs has little interest or ability to show such points<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>yikes<br/>
its worse than i thought<br/>
usgs gives conutx but not nutatx<br/>
moreover the usgs conutx is a couple of miles from the otherwise more <br/>
credible rand mcnally conutx<br/>
m</div>