Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Really Abitrary Points<br/>
Date: Dec 07, 2001 @ 09:15<br/>
Author: Anton Sherwood (Anton Sherwood &lt;bronto@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="4981.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4983.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic2961.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="4981.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4983.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-219620098">acroorca2002 wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; & when doing cross chronologies of say the christian & roman calendars<br/>
&gt; one must be careful to omit the year zero & pass directly from the year 1<br/>
&gt; bce to the year 1 ce or vice versa<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>I sometimes wonder why historians use BC rather than Roman years.<br/>
If Tolkien characters can cope with having year 1 follow year 3021,<br/>
we ought to be able to handle 1 following 753.<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
-- <br/>
Anton Sherwood  --  <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.ogre.nu/">http://www.ogre.nu/</a></div>