Subject: Re: the elusive frgbnl et al<br/>
Date: Dec 07, 2001 @ 05:43<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="4978.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="6861.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic4967.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="4978.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4980.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-935775955">--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;granthutchison&quot; &lt;granthutchison@b...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; Peter:<br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; By the way: look also at <br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.shom.fr/fr_page/fr_prod_lettre/13/lettre13_3.htm">http://www.shom.fr/fr_page/fr_prod_lettre/13/lettre13_3.htm</a> . There <br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; is a little map of the St. Pierre & Miquelon EEZ (at &quot;Partage de <br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; territoires&quot;, click on &quot;carte&quot;)<br/>
<br/>
&gt; Marvellous! You&#39;ve abolished one of my perfs, since St P&M clearly now<br/>
<br/>
&gt; have a corridor to the high seas. <br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>how can you be sure enough yet to completely abolish it<br/>
<br/>
fragman spare that perf<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; I&#39;m still puzzling over what implication your Croatian watery exclave<br/>
<br/>
&gt; has on my EEZ survey. That Slovenian corridor to the edge of<br/>
<br/>
&gt; territorial waters opens into what would be the Croatian continental<br/>
<br/>
&gt; shelf area, if the 1970 boundary between Italy and former Yugoslavia<br/>
<br/>
&gt; is adhered to (and it&#39;s marked on the map, as a continuation of the<br/>
<br/>
&gt; Italian territorial seas border line). So at &quot;my&quot; level,the<br/>
<br/>
&gt; quadripoint at the tip of the exclave changes from High<br/>
<br/>
&gt; Seas/Italy/Croatia/Slovenia to Croatia/Italy/Croatia/Slovenia. A<br/>
<br/>
&gt; topological anomaly I&#39;m having trouble coming to terms with!<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>right<br/>
<br/>
these are the minimax counterparts or poles of this single point<br/>
<br/>
so not really an anomaly but just the predictable 2 layers<br/>
<br/>
& youve got the everyonese maxiprobability exactly right as high seas<br/>
<br/>
tho as peter points out the everyonese miniprobability is now looking like a quintipoint<br/>
<br/>
m</div>