Subject: Re: the elusive frgbnl et al<br/>
Date: Dec 06, 2001 @ 22:05<br/>
Author: granthutchison (&quot;granthutchison&quot; &lt;granthutchison@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="4968.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4971.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic4967.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="4969.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4971.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-933705305">Peter:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; By the way: look also at <br/>
&gt; <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.shom.fr/fr_page/fr_prod_lettre/13/lettre13_3.htm">http://www.shom.fr/fr_page/fr_prod_lettre/13/lettre13_3.htm</a> . There <br/>
&gt; is a little map of the St. Pierre & Miquelon EEZ (at &quot;Partage de <br/>
&gt; territoires&quot;, click on &quot;carte&quot;)<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Marvellous! You&#39;ve abolished one of my perfs, since St P&M clearly now<br/>
have a corridor to the high seas. Again, this casts into doubt the<br/>
accuracy of the map at www.maritimeboundaries.com, which shows the<br/>
Canadian/French equidistance line enclaving St P&M as a &quot;multilateral<br/>
agreement&quot;. From the text at Partage de territoires, it seems that<br/>
Canada liked this border, but France didn&#39;t.<br/>
<br/>
I&#39;m still puzzling over what implication your Croatian watery exclave<br/>
has on my EEZ survey. That Slovenian corridor to the edge of<br/>
territorial waters opens into what would be the Croatian continental<br/>
shelf area, if the 1970 boundary between Italy and former Yugoslavia<br/>
is adhered to (and it&#39;s marked on the map, as a continuation of the<br/>
Italian territorial seas border line). So at &quot;my&quot; level,the<br/>
quadripoint at the tip of the exclave changes from High<br/>
Seas/Italy/Croatia/Slovenia to Croatia/Italy/Croatia/Slovenia. A<br/>
topological anomaly I&#39;m having trouble coming to terms with!<br/>
<br/>
Grant</div>