Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: the abstract and the concrete<br/>
Date: Oct 26, 2001 @ 06:45<br/>
Author: Anton Sherwood (Anton Sherwood &lt;bronto@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="4248.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4266.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic4240.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="4250.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4252.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1495011024"><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:bjbutler@...">bjbutler@...</a> wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; No doubt some California counties have had their boundaries kinked by<br/>
&gt; earthquakes unless, of course, the boundary followed the fault line<br/>
&gt; (not unreasonable since this might create a topological feature.)<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Hmm &lt;checking&gt;... No county lines appear to run along the San Andreas,<br/>
though some stretches of it are quite prominent on the ground.<br/>
<br/>
-- <br/>
Anton Sherwood</div>