Subject: Re: more thinking about breitenstein
Date: Aug 30, 2001 @ 16:53
Author: Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., "m donner" <maxivan82@h...> wrote:
> if the monster &or any of its suspected companions do prove to be
as alive &
> working today as peter & i would both like to believe
> then i think the only remaining question is
> when did it or they become a boundary demarcation
>
> & i realize this is not necessarily the same question as
> when were they erected
> for we dont know whether their original purpose was to mark a
boundary
> or whether they were only subsequently appropriated for that purpose
>
> but leaving that loose end hanging
> the monster does appear to stand approximately on the traditional
celtic
> germanic frontier as described by caesar in the first century bc
>
> & i believe both the rocks & the frontier could be far more ancient
than
> that
> tho i would trim my earlier guess of coeval with stonehenge
> thus 4 or 5 millennia old
> back to perhaps only 3 millennia old
> if druidic is truly the operative word here
>
> & the fact that it was so elaborately christianized
> as one might expect the rock of ages to be
> a quirk of history perhaps
> or a cosmic joke
> or what really
>
> m
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp