Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Famous Confluence Busters
Date: Aug 14, 2001 @ 20:06
Author: m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


also
if you are searching with common gps for an unmarked point or object
guess what
you would most likely lose a rubber on the pitchers mound

m


>From: bjbutler@...
>Reply-To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
>To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: Famous Confluence Busters
>Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 16:07:27 -0000
>
> > > The Confluence Project, where people try to navigate by GPS to 1-
>degree
> > > intersections of latitude and longitude,
> > We have a similar group in the UK. The UK National Grid system
>consists of 100km squares, within which coordinates are defined
>by "easting" and "northing" figures...
>
>There is also the UTM (Universal Transverse Mercator) grid, which
>covers the populated part of the world with a 1km grid in case anyone
>needs to be bombed, arranged in zones. For intersection hunters, a
>major problem must occur near the edges of zones. These areas are
>generally covered by two, non-coincident, grids. I suppose the
>visitors specify the zones when they report their visits. I am just
>not excited by this idea. There are pleanty of "real" (natural
>feature) and pseudo-real ("boundary") points to visit that do not
>depend on the coordinate system.
>
>BJB
>


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp