Subject: Re: oops<br/>
Date: Aug 11, 2001 @ 00:22<br/>
Author: Grant Hutchison (&quot;Grant Hutchison&quot; &lt;granthutchison@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="3561.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="3564.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic3561.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="3561.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="3563.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1974600632"><blockquote><span title="ireply">&gt; feet in mouth<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; m<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Ummmmm... <br/>
Sorry... <br/>
I&#39;ve no idea why you&#39;re sorry. Did I sound vexed? (What&#39;s the written <br/>
equivalent of &quot;sound&quot;?) <br/>
Typical bloody text communication - I seem to have made you feel told <br/>
off and BJB feel ticked off in a single 24hr period, without ever <br/>
intending either. (Maybe emoticons would help, but someone would <br/>
doubtless tell me off for using them.)<br/>
You must always imagine me spreading wide my arms and shrugging, <br/>
rather than wagging an admonitory finger - I&#39;m a shrugging kind of <br/>
guy. (It&#39;s my default stance.)<br/>
 <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; i wonder if just thickening the concave side of the eez lines to a <br/>
&gt; width of 188nm<br/>
 </span></blockquote>But sadly the only relic I have of all this overnight processing is <br/>
the final cylindrical map image, which is at much lower res than the <br/>
data from which it derives - a couple of hundred pixels as against a <br/>
few tens of thousands of data points (lin). The final image has <br/>
blurred out all the fine coastal wiggles (which was grand because I <br/>
wanted them gone because I couldn&#39;t track which were baselined and <br/>
which weren&#39;t). Trying to put them in again in the way you suggest <br/>
would be like ... well, trying to start a game of chess again from an <br/>
out-of-focus image of move 20.<br/>
<br/>
Wondering where the bishop is:<br/>
<br/>
Grant</div>