>From: "m donner"
>To: boundarypoint@egroups.com
>CC: barbaria_longa@...
>Subject: testing &hotdang another multimessage
>Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 00:57:52 +0000
>
>andrew & all
>please forgive me for the difficulties i have unwittingly been
>causing you
>
>evidently they are owing mainly to my wanderings
>but are vastly complicated by the vagaries of our new egroups
>management company
> microsoft or yahoo or somebody
>which valiantly resist my reentry to normal membership
>
>so i trust you will understand
>as i am now still in the process of correcting all this
>
>to date i have gone so far as to create another new identity
>maxivan82
>of which this is a partial test
>so please let me know if anything is any better
>
>but it looks like i may need bills help again here
>
>
>
>& bill
>thank you very much indeed for the kind words
>which came at the perfect moment
>for i do still wish to fulfill what cummings only began
>
>you can see too with a quick altavista browse that he did pretty
>much fully succeed in dropping his caps
>but in most cases his points have continued to stick to him
>
>now i dont know whether he even meant to drop all such spots as
>these
>but i am endeavoring to do just that
> either emulating him or without him
> for i am not sure which
>because i believe the spots limit & clutter my thinking
>
>
>
>& peter
>i congratulate & emulate you for sticking with the cockabebble
>notational process
>because i think it is valuable for many reasons
>not the least of which is to be able to speak more & more easily &
>enjoyably together about all these punctological & linealogical &
>arealogical realities
>
>indeed i would only wish to continually advance & refine all this
>because it has already advanced & enhanced the list enormously
>
>
>
>& brian
>what
>do you mean the 2 of you only had one old mule of a moose for the 2
>of you
>you really shouldve stopped at my house
>
>but seriously
>nice work on starting that mnndsd cairn
>which i will add to at least mentally now
>
>i dont trust the usgs topo
>but i figure it places the tripoint about 80 feet east of the
>witness monument
>& thus about 55 feet west of your cairn
>
>it seems to suggest that both the mnnd & the mnsd boundaries have
>changed with some natural as well as with some manmade changes in
>the river
>but my questioning usgs about this has been fruitless
>as has my search for legal documentation of any changes
>
>therefore i continue to think it likely that jack is still correct
>in following bus&ss & the statement on the witness monument
>which all say go 9 chains east young man
>but i would add dont try that until the ground & river have frozen
>
>however if we are all still correct in this belief
>it means your cairn is 459 feet too far west
>
>
>also i applaud your extreme courage & whimsy again & again for
>representing dry pan as true pan
>dry ohn as true ohn
>etc etc
>etc etc
>especially here where we are so extremist about getting to the
>truest available truth
>
>you seem to be suggesting in this & i would agree that all the cards
>are just unwild jokers when compared to the multipoints
>except i would add perhaps i could still get excited about a
>complete perfect news tour meld
>
>btw
>it appears you guys are now the top crows of caus
>with your only potential competition locked up in taiwan
>
>& you may also very well have become top dogs of charter expense
>since the old record spent on a single taxi ride is believed to have
>been only 308 americanski
>
>
>
>now david & jesper & anyone else still tuned to atchde
>i appreciate your approaching gideon on this
>& would like to scratch my remaining itches here in the meantime
>
>first
>what is the source of the 25m isobath limit of all 3 national
>sovereignties
>
>second
>is everything deeper than 25m trisovereign or nonsovereign or what
>
>third
>are there any isolated shallows of less than 25m within the
>generally deeper interior reaches of the lake
>& if so do they produce claves
>& if so are such claves allocated according to the equidistance
>lines
>
>fourth
>isnt equidistance in any case the primary or default regime &
>bathymetry only a secondary delineation within that
>& wouldnt gideon therefore also be correct to at least hypothesize a
>tripoint on this basis
>
>fifth
>could the zoomables & encyclopedia britannica also be wrong about
>this tripoint
>
>
>
>
>& finally grant
>out there on the leading edge of everyones land
>
>i wonder if you are also considering adding the places where
>continental shelf sovereign rights claims exceed the 200nm eezs &
>might to that extent further diminish the common wealth of everyones
>land
>if not actually its sovereign territory
>
>also wondering whether the normally 12nm sovereign territorial
>limits can be added to these existing maps
>so that the full ebb & flow of our domains can be seen at a glance
>
>
>& as mentioned
>i think we may need to add a special extra salient or proruption
>onto the coast here at yachats
>
>the name evidently originally meant
> where the ocean comes to the river
>& a deep embayment & estuary makes it still seem true
>so this would be a very appropriate place for our landing even if
>what i have been saying about it werent true
>
>but of course we are also standing by expectantly now at lake
>constance for the possible announcement of a nonsovereign zone in
>the middle of the lake there
>
>& we could conceivably emerge in strength from it as early as next
>month
>say in a wild eyed scenario if the bp amphibious unit aka gcebe
>were there on the spot to play everyonese creature from the deep
>& stake our first continental claim outside antarctica right in the
>heart of europe
>
>
>& for the millennium please see
>http://www.mohawk.net/~barbaria/millennium.html
>
>m
>
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com