Subject: Re: Baarle Military Map
Date: Jun 27, 2001 @ 07:04
Author: Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> >But the Dutch map is much more recent than the Belgian one, and itfields, one
> >does show the Withagen enclave, the most recent one. This one the
> >Belgian map doesn't show.
>
> But in the wrong place, and 4x too large!
> It is not the square of forest it is marked on.
> On the NE side of what is shown as Withhagen are two rectangular
> with a small bridge over the drain that lines their NE side.withagen, which
> The easternmost of these two fields is the true location of
> occupies the northern third of this easternmost field, in otherwords the
> portion of the field between the 'a' and 'g' in the word Withagenon the map
> 50B Breda.Thank you for that information. The Topografische Dienst should be
>see if I
> I have written to TDN about this, and they said they would check to
> was correct! I got the information fomr the cadastral authoritiesin Breda
> who have the original maps of the enclaves, and who should know. Sowe will
> see if it is changed in the next edition. Dutch mpping has a 2 yearrevision
> programme currently.Dutch sheet
>
> Also,besides H7 De Louveren (H7), H18 AND H12 are missing fomr
> 50G Baarle-Nassau!!! And an inadvertent piece of boundary is shownat 1215E,
> 3803N.That piece of boundary I already spotted myself. It is clear that
> Sloppy.Exactly.
>
> BW